Carceral geographical perspective on Turku Spinhouse, 1820–1825

Författare

  • Johanna Annola Tampereen yliopisto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54332/krim.125038

Nyckelord:

spinhouse, carceral geography, carceral layers, intermediate zones, inscription

Abstract

From the 1820s onwards, Turku Spinhouse was a place of forced labour for women who had been incarcerated for vagrancy. This article explores how the sparse administrative source material, dating from the early 1820s, can be analysed by using frameworks originally developed by carceral geographers. The research questions are: what kind of policies were employed by prison administration when making decisions on prison space, and what kind of scopes of action were open to prisoners in this space. The key findings are, first, that the different functions of prison were present simultaneously as carceral layers, the density of which varied over space and time. Second, the prison sickroom, church and the room reserved for Roma inmates may have been interpreted by prisoners as intermediate zones, where they could behave more freely than elsewhere. Third, the inmates’ bodies were not necessarily inscribed by prison, because the conditions in the Spinhouse were not worse than those of an average poor person of the time, and because the prison administration took measures to avoid the stigmatization of the inmates.

Referenser

Caputo-Levine, D. (2013). The yard face: The contributions of inmate interpersonal violence to carceral habitus. Ethnography, 14(2), 168–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138112457299

Crewe, B. & Warr, J. & Bennett, P. & Smith, A. (2014). The emotional geography of prison life. Theoretical Criminology, 18(1), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480613497778

Dirsuweit, T. (1999). Carceral spaces in South Africa: A case study of institutional power, sexuality, and transgression in a women’s prison. Geoforum, 30, 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7185(98)00030-X

Foucault, M. (2005). Tarkkailla ja rangaista (käänt. E. Nivanka). Helsinki: Otava.

Hannula, I. (1981). Vankeinhoitoon liittyvän lainsäädännön historiaa 1881–1975. Teoksessa E. Suominen (toim.) Suomen vankeinhoidon historiaa, osa 1: Katsauksia vankeinhoidon kehitykseen (s. 85–177). Helsinki: Valtion painatuskeskus.

Harjula, M. & Annola, J. & Ekholm, L. (2021). Etniset ja sosiaaliset vähemmistöt Suomessa. Teoksessa P. Markkola, M. Niemi & P. Haapala (toim.) Suomalaisen yhteiskunnan historia 1400–2000 (s. 289–325). Tampere: Vastapaino.

Jewkes, Y. (2013). On carceral space and agency. Teoksessa D. Moran, N. Gill & D. Conlon (toim.) Carceral Spaces: Mobility and Agency in Imprisonment and Migrant Detention (s. 127–132). Farnham: Ashgate.

Letto-Vanamo, P. & Ylikangas, H. (1981). Hajapiirteitä laillisen vapaudenriiston ja sen toimeenpanon kehityksestä esiteollisena aikana. Teoksessa E. Suominen (toim.) Suomen vankeinhoidon historiaa, osa 1: Katsauksia vankeinhoidon kehitykseen (s. 37–84). Helsinki: Valtion painatuskeskus.

McGeachan, C. (2019). "A Prison within a prison”?: Examining the enfolding spatialities of care and control in the Barlinnie Special Unit. Area, 51(2), 200–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12447

Milhaud, O. & Moran, D. (2013). Penal space and privacy in French and Russian prisons. Teoksessa D. Moran, N. Gill & D. Conlon (toim.) Carceral Spaces: Mobility and Agency in Imprisonment and Migrant Detention (s. 167–182). Farnham: Ashgate.

Moran, D. (2015a). Afterword. Teoksessa K. Morin & D. Moran (toim.) Historical Geographies of Prisons: Unlocking the Usable Carceral Past. (s. 219–223). London & New York: Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315724997-13

Moran, D. (2015b). Carceral Geography: Spaces and Practices of Incarceration. Taylor & Francis Group. E-kirja.

Nygård, T. (1998). Erilaisten historiaa. Marginaaliryhmät Suomessa 1800-luvulla ja 1900-luvun alussa. Jyväskylä: Atena.

Repo, V. (2020). Confined to Space: Perspectives on Carceral Geography. Turku: University of Turku.

Philo, C. & Parr, H. & Burns, N. (2017). The rural Panopticon. Journal of Rural Studies, 51, 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.08.007

Pukero, P. (2009). Epämääräisestä elämästä kruunun haltuun. Irtolaisuuden ja huono-osaisuuden kontrolli Itä-Suomessa 1860–1885. Joensuu: Joensuun yliopisto.

Pulma, P. (1994). Vaivaisten valtakunta. Teoksessa J. Jaakkola, P. Pulma, M. Satka & K. Urponen (toim.) Armeliaisuus, yhteisöapu, sosiaaliturva: Suomalaisen sosiaalisen turvan historia (s. 15–70). Helsinki: Sosiaaliturvan keskusliitto.

Schneider, L.T. (2023). Let me take a vacation in prison before the streets kill me! Rough sleepers’ longing for prison and the reversal of less eligibility in neoliberal carceral continuum. Punishment and Society, 25(1), 60–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745211010222

Sibley, D. & van Hoven. B. (2009). The contamination of personal space: Boundary construction in a prison environment. Area, 41(2), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00855.x

Smoyer, A. & Blankenship, K. M. (2014). Dealing food: Female drug users’ narratives about food in a prison place and implications for their health. International Journal of Drug Policy, 25(3), 562–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.10.013

Vainio-Korhonen, K. (2018). Musta-Maija ja Kirppu-Kaisa. Seksityöläiset 1800-luvun alun Suomessa. Helsinki: SKS.

Virtanen, V. (1944). Suomen vankeinhoito I. Helsinki: SKS.

Wahidin, A. (2002). Reconfiguring older bodies in the prison time machine. Journal of Aging and Identity, 7(3), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019764506372

Wahidin, A. & Tate, S. (2005). Prison (e)scapes and body tropes: Older women in the prison time machine. Body & Society, 11(2), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X05052462

Nedladdningar

Publicerad

2023-04-27

Referera så här

Carceral geographical perspective on Turku Spinhouse, 1820–1825. (2023). Kriminologia, 3(1), 60-72. https://doi.org/10.54332/krim.125038